<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 20: News to Week of September 4th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beforethedawn.ca/2009/09/07/episode-20-news-to-week-of-september-4th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beforethedawn.ca/2009/09/07/episode-20-news-to-week-of-september-4th/</link>
	<description>All Things Twilight in One Entertaining and Informative Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 06:46:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wray</title>
		<link>http://beforethedawn.ca/2009/09/07/episode-20-news-to-week-of-september-4th/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Wray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beforethedawn.ca/?p=188#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Fascinating about the Vanity Fair &quot;New Establishment&quot; list.  I generally don&#039;t pay attention to things like that, but there is at least one thing that makes me smile -  Stephenie&#039;s fanbase is almost exclusively female.  Go Stephenie!  Also, the fact that &quot;Twilight&quot; was her first book just blows my mind.  It irks me too that  &quot;Mormon housewife&quot; is always invoked, but much the same was done with Jo Rowling.  It was always the &quot; unemployed single mother&quot; angle, which turned out to be a stretch of the truth.  

The Lauren Bacall comments were not surprising, I might say the same thing myself (if I had any grandchildren). It&#039;s all about offering historical perspective, understanding where things come from.  Wouldn&#039;t it be something to have the opportunity to listen to Ms. Bacall&#039;s stories about old Hollywood!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating about the Vanity Fair &#8220;New Establishment&#8221; list.  I generally don&#8217;t pay attention to things like that, but there is at least one thing that makes me smile &#8211;  Stephenie&#8217;s fanbase is almost exclusively female.  Go Stephenie!  Also, the fact that &#8220;Twilight&#8221; was her first book just blows my mind.  It irks me too that  &#8220;Mormon housewife&#8221; is always invoked, but much the same was done with Jo Rowling.  It was always the &#8221; unemployed single mother&#8221; angle, which turned out to be a stretch of the truth.  </p>
<p>The Lauren Bacall comments were not surprising, I might say the same thing myself (if I had any grandchildren). It&#8217;s all about offering historical perspective, understanding where things come from.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be something to have the opportunity to listen to Ms. Bacall&#8217;s stories about old Hollywood!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
